Relugolix combination therapy in Black/African American women with symptomatic uterine fibroids: LIBERTY Long-Term Extension study.

BACKGROUND: In the LIBERTY Long-Term Extension study, once-daily relugolix combination therapy (40 mg relugolix, estradiol 1 mg, norethindrone acetate 0.5 mg) substantially improved uterine fibroid-associated heavy menstrual bleeding throughout the 52-week treatment period in the overall study population. OBJECTIVE: Black or African American women typically experience a greater extent of disease and symptom burden of uterine fibroids vs other racial groups and have traditionally been underrepresented in clinical trials. This secondary analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of relugolix combination therapy in the subgroup population of Black or African American women with uterine fibroids in the LIBERTY Long-Term Extension study. STUDY DESIGN: Black or African American premenopausal women (aged 18-50 years) with uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding who completed the 24-week randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind LIBERTY 1 (identifier: NCT03049735) or LIBERTY 2 (identifier: NCT03103087) trials were eligible to enroll in the 28-week LIBERTY Long-Term Extension study (identifier: NCT03412890), in which all women received once-daily, open-label relugolix combination therapy. The primary endpoint of this subanalysis was the proportion of Black or African American treatment responders: women who achieved a menstrual blood loss volume of <80 mL and at least a 50% reduction in menstrual blood loss volume from the pivotal study baseline to the last 35 days of treatment by pivotal study randomized treatment group. The secondary outcomes included rates of amenorrhea and changes in symptom burden and quality of life. RESULTS: Overall, 241 of 477 women (50.5%) enrolled in the LIBERTY Long-Term Extension study self-identified as Black or African American. In Black or African American women receiving continuous relugolix combination therapy for up to 52 weeks, 58 of 70 women (82.9%; 95% confidence interval, 72.0%-90.8%) met the treatment responder criteria for reduction in heavy menstrual bleeding (primary endpoint). A substantial reduction in menstrual blood loss volume from the pivotal study baseline to week 52 was demonstrated (least squares mean percentage change: 85.0%); 64.3% of women achieved amenorrhea; 59.1% of women with anemia at the pivotal study baseline achieved a substantial improvement (>2 g/dL) in hemoglobin levels; and decreased symptom severity and distress because of uterine fibroid-associated symptoms and improvements in health-related quality of life through 52 weeks were demonstrated. The most frequently reported adverse events during the cumulative 52-week treatment period were hot flush (12.9%), headache (5.7%), and hypertension (5.7%). Bone mineral density was preserved through 52 weeks. CONCLUSION: Once-daily relugolix combination therapy improved uterine fibroid-associated heavy menstrual bleeding in most Black or African American women who participated in the LIBERTY Long-Term Extension study. The safety and efficacy profile of relugolix combination therapy in Black or African American women was consistent with previously published results from the overall study population through 52 weeks. Findings from this subanalysis will assist shared decision-making by helping providers and Black or African American women understand the efficacy and safety of relugolix combination therapy as a pharmacologic option for the management of uterine fibroid-associated symptoms.

Factors Predicting Removals of the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System in an Adolescent Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Use of 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in adolescents for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), dysmenorrhea, and contraception has increased, yet little is known about the factors predicting removal and dissatisfaction in adolescents. The aim of this study was to identify factors predicting LNG-IUS removal in adolescents. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including all adolescents (9-19 years) who underwent LNG-IUS insertion between 2012 and 2021 (n = 536). A medical record review was conducted and data were collated on medical and gynecological history, age, indications for insertion, complications, expulsions, and removals. The data were analyzed using χ2 tests. RESULTS: Indications for LNG-IUS insertions (n = 536) among 517 individual patients (n = 517) included menstrual management (n = 142), HMB alone (n = 118), HMB and pelvic pain/dysmenorrhea (n = 105), dysmenorrhea/pelvic pain alone (n = 47), and contraception (n = 16). Associated diagnoses included intellectual disability (44.29%, 229/517), chronic pain conditions (12.77%, 66/517), and additional mental health concerns (24.37%, 126/517). Patient dissatisfaction with LNG-IUS led to removal in 61 (11.38%), mostly for pain or persistent bleeding. Higher removal rates occurred in those with associated chronic pain conditions (46.97%, χ2 = 55.9, P < .05), mental health concerns (16.67%, χ2 = 5.06, P < .05), and bleeding disorders (26.32%, χ2 = 5.09, P < .05). Among the cohort with an intellectual disability, lower rates of removal occurred (5.7%, χ2 = 11.2, P < .05). Whereas the LNG-IUS removal rate among gender-diverse youth was 23.07%, this was not statistically significant. Younger age was also not associated with a statistically significant increase in removals (13.72%, χ2 = 0.73, P > .05). DISCUSSION: Adolescents have a low dissatisfaction and removal rate (11.38%) of LNG-IUS. Chronic pain, bleeding tendency, and mental health concerns are associated with higher removal rates and intellectual disability with lower rates. These findings are useful in counselling patients and families about LNG-IUS.

Oral hormonal therapy as treatment option for abnormal uterine bleeding.

BACKGROUND: abnormal uterine bleeding is a very frequent reason for referral to gynaecologists and can deeply influence the quality of life. Once organic causes requiring surgical treatment are ruled out, clinicians should be able to manage these patients conservatively in the most effective way. MATERIALS AND METHODS: a search in PubMed/MEDLINE database was conducted in order to find relevant and recent meaningful sources for this narrative review. RESULTS: LNG-IUS 52 mg is the first-line treatment for non-organic causes. Nevertheless, it could be contraindicated or declined by the patient. Combined oral contraceptives (COC) and progestin-only pills inhibit the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, preventing ovulation, and induce endometrial atrophy. Consequently, they are effective in treating AUB. Moreover, brand new pills containing a combination of oestrogens, progestins and GnRH antagonists are now available for the management of AUB related to uterine fibroids. CONCLUSIONS: In daily clinical practice, oral hormonal therapies are convenient and reversible tools to manage AUB when LNG-IUS 52 mg is contraindicated or turn down by the patient. Many oral hormonal therapies are prescribed to treat AUB, but only a few have been approved with this specific indication, therefore further large well-designed studies are necessary in order to compare the efficacy of different pills for treating AUB.

Even though LNG-IUS 52 mg is the first-line treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding, oral hormonal therapies should be effectively managed by gynaecologists in case of contraindications or patient's decline. Contraceptive pills are practical, but further studies are necessary to compare their efficacy and to approve them with the specific AUB indication.

Rates of medical or surgical treatment for women with heavy menstrual bleeding: the ECLIPSE trial 10-year observational follow-up study.

Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding is a common problem that can significantly affect women's lives until menopause. There is a lack of evidence on longer-term outcomes after seeking health care and treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding. Objectives: To assess the continuation rates of medical treatments and the rates of ablative and surgical interventions among women who had participated in the ECLIPSE trial (ISRCTN86566246) 10 years after initial management for heavy menstrual bleeding in primary care. To explore experiences of heavy menstrual bleeding and influences on treatment for women. Design: This was a prospective observational cohort study, with a parallel qualitative study. Setting: Primary care. Participants: A total of 206 women with heavy menstrual bleeding who had participated in the ECLIPSE trial consented to providing outcome data via a questionnaire approximately 10 years after original randomisation. Their mean age at follow-up was 54 years (standard deviation 5 years). A purposeful sample of 36 women also participated in semistructured qualitative interviews. Interventions: The ECLIPSE trial randomised participants to either the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (52 mg) or the usual medical treatment (oral tranexamic acid, mefenamic acid, combined oestrogen-progestogen or progesterone alone, chosen as clinically appropriate by general practitioners and women). Women could subsequently swap or cease their allocated treatment. Main outcome measures: The main outcome measures were rates of ablative and surgical treatments; the rate of continuation of medical treatments; and quality of life using the Short Form questionnaire-36 items and EuroQol-5 Dimensions; women's experiences of heavy menstrual bleeding; and the influences on their decisions around treatment. Results: Over the 10-year follow-up period, 60 out of 206 (29%) women had received a surgical intervention [hysterectomy, n = 34 (17%); endometrial ablation, n = 26 (13%)]. Between 5 and 10 years post trial intervention, 89 women (43%) had ceased all medical treatments and 88 (43%) were using the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system alone or in combination with other oral treatments. More women in the usual medical treatment group had also used the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system than women in the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system group. Fifty-six women (28%) used the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system at 10 years. There was no statistically significant difference in generic quality-of-life scores between the two original trial groups, although small improvements in the majority of domains were seen in both groups across time. Women reported wide-ranging impacts on their quality of life and normalisation of their heavy menstrual bleeding experience as a result of the taboo around menstruation. Women's treatment decisions and experiences were influenced by the perceived quality of health-care interactions with clinicians and their climacteric status. Limitations: Fewer than half of the original 571 participants participated; however, the cohort was clinically and demographically representative of the original trial population. Conclusions: Medical treatments for women with heavy menstrual bleeding can be initiated in primary care, with low rates of surgical intervention and improvement in quality of life observed 10 years later. Clinicians should be aware of the considerable challenges that women with heavy menstrual bleeding experience at presentation and subsequently over time, and the importance and value to women of patient-centred communication in this context. Future work: Any further evaluation of treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding should include long-term evaluation of outcomes and adherence. Trial registration: The original ECLIPSE trial was registered as ISRCTN86566246. Funding: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 17. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Heavy menstrual bleeding is a common problem that can significantly affect women's lives, yet many women do not seek medical help. Medical treatments, such as tablets and a hormonal coil inserted in the womb, were shown to help women with heavy menstrual bleeding in a previous clinical trial that we conducted, called ECLIPSE. In the ECLIPSE trial, women provided information for 5 years after their treatment started. We planned to continue to ask these women about their periods, their symptoms and quality of life, and the treatments that they chose about 10 years after they first joined the trial. We did this using questionnaires and by interviewing women. We received questionnaires from 206 out of the 490 women (42%) who had participated in the ECLIPSE trial 10 years earlier. Responders were, on average, 54 years old, and half reported that they had reached the menopause. About 3 in 10 women overall had either received a hysterectomy or undergone destruction of the womb lining. Just over one-quarter of women were using the hormonal coil. Quality of life remained improved and was generally higher than that before treatment. There was no big difference in quality of life or in the numbers of women having surgery between those who first used tablets and those who received the coil. Women described the wide-ranging impact of heavy bleeding on their lives and the taboo around periods. Women's experience of good or poor communication with their doctors, and thoughts about fertility and menopause, influenced the treatment choices that they made. Women's quality of life was improved by medical treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding, even as menopause approached, and this shows the importance of these treatments. This research can help doctors and women to make more informed decisions about medical and surgical treatments.

Low-Dose Elagolix for the Treatment of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Patients With Uterine Leiomyomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of elagolix 150 mg once-daily monotherapy in patients with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine leiomyomas. METHODS: A phase 4, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-month treatment study was conducted in premenopausal patients aged 18-51 years with heavy menstrual bleeding (defined as menstrual blood loss greater than 80 mL during one menstrual cycle) associated with uterine leiomyomas. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive elagolix 150 mg once daily or placebo. The primary endpoint was reduction in menstrual blood loss volume to less than 80 mL at the final month and at least a 50% reduction in menstrual blood loss volume from baseline to the final month. RESULTS: Of 82 randomized patients, 54 received elagolix 150 mg and 28 received placebo. With elagolix, 49.4% (95% CI 35.1-63.8%) of patients met the primary endpoint, compared with 23.3% (95% CI 7.2-39.5%) of patients who received placebo ( P =.035). Statistically significant differences between elagolix and placebo in mean reduction of menstrual blood loss from baseline were seen as early as month 1 ( P <.05 for months 1-3 and 5). Significantly more patients receiving elagolix experienced suppression of bleeding compared with placebo ( P =.036). Greater improvements were observed in the elagolix group (vs placebo) in the proportion of patients with amenorrhea, in hemoglobin concentrations, and in health-related quality of life. No serious or severe adverse events were reported for elagolix, compared with 7.1% of participants in the placebo group having serious adverse events (coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19] n=1, enlarged uvula n=1). Three patients (5.6%) discontinued elagolix due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: Elagolix 150 mg once-daily monotherapy significantly improved heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine leiomyomas compared with placebo in premenopausal patients. Treatment with elagolix 150 mg once daily was generally well-tolerated in this study, with no new safety signals. FUNDING SOURCE: AbbVie Inc. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03886220.

LIBERTY randomized withdrawal study: relugolix combination therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids.

BACKGROUND: In the pivotal LIBERTY 1 and 2 trials and long-term extension study, once-daily relugolix combination therapy (40 mg relugolix, 1 mg estradiol, 0.5 mg norethindrone acetate) reduced menstrual blood loss volume and pain among women with uterine fibroids. Relugolix combination therapy was well tolerated with preservation of bone mineral density through 52 weeks. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report the 2-year relugolix combination therapy efficacy and safety results of the phase 3 LIBERTY randomized withdrawal study. STUDY DESIGN: Women with uterine fibroid-associated heavy menstrual bleeding who completed the 24-week LIBERTY 1 or 2 trials, followed by the 28-week long-term extension study (up to 52 weeks total treatment), and who met the responder criteria (menstrual blood loss volume <80 mL and ≥50% reduction from pivotal study baseline at week 48 [week 24 of long-term extension]) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either blinded treatment with relugolix combination therapy or placebo for 52 weeks (total treatment period, 104 weeks). For women who had a relapse of heavy menstrual bleeding during the study (menstrual blood loss volume ≥80 mL), open-label relugolix combination therapy was offered. The primary endpoint was the proportion of women who maintained menstrual blood loss volume <80 mL through week 76 (week 24 of randomized withdrawal study). Secondary endpoints included time to menstrual blood loss volume ≥80 mL, proportion of women who maintained a menstrual blood loss volume of <80 mL through week 104 (over the 52-week randomized treatment period), the proportion of women who achieved or maintained amenorrhea at week 76 at the end of treatment, and the change in Uterine Fibroid Symptom-Quality of Life Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort Scale and symptom severity scores. Analyses were performed for the modified intent-to-treat population, including all randomized women who received ≥1 dose of the study drug. RESULTS: Of the 229 randomized women (relugolix combination therapy, n=115; placebo, n=114), 228 received the study drug and 175 (76.7%) completed the randomized withdrawal study. Through week 76, 78.4% of women on relugolix combination therapy maintained menstrual blood loss volume <80 mL vs 15.1% in the placebo group (difference, 63.4%; 95% confidence interval, 52.9%-73.9%; P<.0001). At week 104, 69.8% of women on relugolix combination therapy maintained menstrual blood loss volume <80 mL vs 11.8% in the placebo group (difference, 58.0%; 95% confidence interval, 47.0%-69.1%; P<.0001). Through week 104, 88.3% of women on placebo relapsed with heavy menstrual bleeding (median time to relapse, 5.9 weeks). Among the 89 women in the placebo group who relapsed and received open-label rescue treatment, 87 women responded to relugolix combination therapy with a menstrual blood loss volume <80 mL. The proportion of women who achieved or maintained amenorrhea were 57.4% vs 13.3% at week 76 (difference, 44.1%; 95% confidence interval, 33.10%-55.1%; P<.0001) and 58.3% vs 10.6% at week 104 (difference, 47.6%; 95% confidence interval, 37.0%-58.3%; nominal P<.0001) for relugolix combination therapy and the placebo group, respectively. Relugolix combination therapy was generally well tolerated; no new safety signals were identified, and the adverse event profile over the second year was consistent with that reported through the first year of treatment. Bone mineral density remained stable in women who received relugolix combination therapy from week 52 to week 104. In women continuously treated with relugolix combination therapy up to 2 years, bone mineral density was generally preserved. CONCLUSION: After 2 years of treatment with relugolix combination therapy, there was evidence of durability of the effect in maintaining low menstrual blood loss volume in women with symptomatic uterine fibroids. Most women had return of heavy menstrual bleeding and associated symptoms after treatment cessation, which improved upon retreatment with relugolix combination therapy. Relugolix combination therapy was well tolerated, the adverse event profile remained consistent, and the mean bone mineral density was generally preserved through 2 years of treatment.

Incidence of Hypophosphatemia After Intravenous Administration of Iron: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Data from Japanese Randomized Controlled Trials.

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous (IV) administration of iron is considered a safe and efficacious treatment for iron deficiency anemia (IDA), recommended in patients requiring rapid replenishment of iron, or intolerant or unresponsive to oral administration of iron. Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown high incidence of hypophosphatemia after administration of two IV iron preparations: saccharated ferric oxide (SFO) and ferric carboxymaltose (FCM). The present study aimed to conduct matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) of hypophosphatemia incidence with these iron formulations and ferric derisomaltose (FDI) based on data from head-to-head RCTs conducted in Japan. METHODS: A MAIC of hypophosphatemia incidence was conducted on the basis of data from two head-to-head RCTs. The relative odds of hypophosphatemia with FDI versus SFO were obtained from patient-level data from a recent RCT and adjusted for cumulative iron dose, while parametric models of serum phosphate levels from a separate RCT were used to estimate the relative odds of hypophosphatemia with FCM with SFO. An anchored MAIC was then conducted comparing FDI with FCM. RESULTS: The adjusted odds of experiencing hypophosphatemia were significantly lower with FDI than SFO [odds ratio (OR) of 0.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01-0.05]. The parametric models of serum phosphate from the RCT comparing FCM with SFO provided an estimated OR of 1.17 for the incidence of hypophosphatemia with FCM versus SFO. Combining the two estimates in the MAIC showed that the odds of experiencing hypophosphatemia would be 52.5 (95% CI 27.7-99.4) times higher with FCM than FDI in patients with IDA associated with heavy menstrual bleeding in Japan. CONCLUSIONS: Direct comparison of patient-level data and a MAIC from two RCTs in Japanese patients with heavy menstrual bleeding indicated that hypophosphatemia is less frequent in patients treated with FDI than those with FCM or SFO. Results are in agreement with RCTs comparing FDI and FCM in patients with various etiologies conducted in the USA and Europe.

Impact of nausea/vomiting on EQ-5D-5L utility scores in patients taking iron preparations for heavy menstrual bleeding or anemia.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to establish an estimating equation to predict the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) utility score in patients taking iron preparations for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) or anemia and to evaluate whether the presence of nausea or vomiting was a significant predictor of EQ-5D-5L-based quality of life. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted to collect EQ-5D-5L utility scores and other patient reported outcomes from 385 patients taking iron preparations for HMB or anemia who were selected from the disease patient panel. Using the utility scores as objective variables, explanatory variable candidates were selected considering correlations, multicollinearity, and clinical validity. Predicting models were constructed using regression-based models (linear model, generalized linear model (GLM), Tobit model). Stepwise regression method was applied for selecting statistically significant (p < 0.05) predictors. Goodness-of-fit of models were assessed by mean absolute error and mean squared error (MSE). RESULTS: The EQ-5D-5L utility scores (mean ± standard deviation) of 96 patients with nausea/vomiting and 289 patients without nausea/vomiting were 0.67 ± 0.16 and 0.84 ± 0.14, respectively (p < 0.001). The presence of nausea/vomiting was shown to be the most significant factor reducing the utility score in the statistical models using the explanatory variable candidates selected in the study. As the results of the goodness-of-fit test, GLM with the smallest MSE was selected to establish the estimating equation. CONCLUSION: The estimating equation to predict the EQ-5D-5L utility scores in patients taking iron preparations for HMB or anemia was established. The presence of nausea/vomiting was found to be a factor significantly reducing utility scores, with a decrement of the value estimated to be -0.117. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000045700 ( http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ ). Registered on October 11, 2021.

A randomized trial comparing the 52-mg levonorgestrel system with combination oral contraceptives for treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding.

BACKGROUND: The levonorgestrel intrauterine system and combined oral contraceptives are the 2 most commonly used nonsurgical treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding in the United States. However, there are limited data on their relative effectiveness and on their impact on bleeding-specific quality of life. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system with that of combined oral contraceptives for improving quality of life among individuals who self-report heavy menstrual bleeding. We hypothesized that the levonorgestrel intrauterine system would be more effective than combined oral contraceptives at 6 and 12 months after treatment. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a pragmatic randomized trial of individuals who self-reported heavy menstrual bleeding. Individuals were eligible if they did not have contraindications to either the levonorgestrel intrauterine system or combined oral contraceptives and were determined to have a nonstructural cause of heavy menstrual bleeding. Eligible and consenting participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system or a monophasic 30- or 35-µg ethinyl estradiol-containing combined oral contraceptive. The main outcome was mean change in bleeding-related quality of life, measured by the 20-question Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire (score range, 0-75) at 6 and 12 months. Differences in group means and confidence intervals for the Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire score were computed by multivariable linear mixed-effects regression; 24 participants per group were needed to detect a 10-point difference in change in mean Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire score between individuals treated with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and those treated with combined oral contraceptives at each follow-up time point. RESULTS: A total of 62 individuals were randomly assigned to treatment (n=29 allocated to levonorgestrel intrauterine system and n=33 allocated to combined oral contraceptives) and included in the intention-to-treat analyses; 19 of 29 received the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and 31 of 33 received combined oral contraceptives. Eleven percent identified as Black or African American and 44% identified as Hispanic or Latina. Participant characteristics were similar among study groups. Bleeding-related quality of life increased in both study arms, as reflected by a significant decrease in Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire scores beginning at 6-week follow-up. In the main intention-to-treat analyses (n=62), there were no differences in mean change in Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire scores at 6 months (difference=-2.5; 95% confidence interval, -10.0 to +5.0) or 12 months (difference=-1.1; 95% confidence interval, -8.7 to +6.5). Findings were similar in the subsets of participants with any follow-up visits (n=52) and who completed all follow-up visits (n=42). In the per-protocol analyses (n=47), a significantly greater decrease in Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire score was observed in the levonorgestrel intrauterine system arm at 6 months after treatment (difference=-7.0; 95% confidence interval, -13.8 to -0.2) but not at 12 months (difference=-4.8; 95% confidence interval, -11.8 to 2.3) compared with the combined oral contraceptive arm. CONCLUSION: No differences in change of bleeding-related quality of life were observed between the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and combined oral contraceptives at 6 or 12 months. Patients should be counseled that the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and combined oral contraceptives are both effective options for improving bleeding-related quality of life.

Heavy menstrual bleeding, iron deficiency, and iron deficiency anemia: Framing the issue.

For girls and women in their reproductive years, the symptom of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is the most common cause of iron deficiency (ID), including the extreme manifestation of iron deficiency anemia (IDA). It is recognized that these two clinical entities are not only ubiquitous, but their interrelationship is poorly appreciated and frequently normalized by society, healthcare providers, and affected girls and women themselves. Both HMB and ID/IDA adversely impact quality of life-HMB during the episodes of bleeding and ID daily as long as the ID exists. These combined issues undermine the lives of reproductive-aged girls and women of all ages, from menarche to menopause. At the same time, pervading culture and the often insidious nature of these disorders frequently lead to societal normalization, including by healthcare professionals. The effects on cognitive function as well as the related work and school absenteeism and presenteeism can undermine the efforts and function of women in all walks of life, be they students, educators, employers, or employees. There is also an increasing body of evidence suggesting that ID, even in early pregnancy, may adversely impact fetal neurodevelopment with enduring effects on a spectrum of cognitive and psychological disorders-effects that can have widespread impacts on society. Collectively, this critically important evidence begs the implementation of diagnostic and management guidelines aimed at identifying iron-deficient girls and women, repleting their iron stores, and, when present, effectively treating the most common reason for the problem-the various causes of the symptom of HMB.

Efficacy and safety of vilaprisan in women with uterine fibroids: data from the ASTEROID 3 randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Vilaprisan is a highly potent selective progesterone receptor modulator shown to reduce heavy menstrual bleeding, induce amenorrhea, and diminish uterine fibroid volume in phase 2 studies. The objective of ASTEROID 3 was to demonstrate the superiority of vilaprisan compared with placebo in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding in women with uterine fibroids. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase 3 study. SETTING: Hospitals and medical centers. PATIENT(S): Women with ≥1 uterine fibroid of ≥3 cm and heavy menstrual bleeding of >80 mL/cycle. INTERVENTION(S): Women were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment arms, which were planned to comprise 2 treatment periods of 12 weeks, each with vilaprisan (2 mg/d) or placebo that were continuous or separated by a break of one bleed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Amenorrhea (primary end point; <2 mL in the last 28 days of treatment) and heavy menstrual bleeding response (key secondary end point; <80 mL/cycle and >50% reduction in bleeding from baseline) were measured with the alkaline hematin method. Change in volume of the 3 largest fibroids from baseline to end of treatment was assessed by ultrasound. Safety was monitored throughout the study. RESULT(S): Overall, 75 women completed the first 12 weeks of treatment. Statistically significant and clinically meaningful differences were observed between the vilaprisan- and placebo-treated groups in both the full analysis and per-protocol sets. In the per-protocol set (n = 36 and n = 12 for the vilaprisan and placebo groups, respectively), amenorrhea was observed more frequently in women treated with vilaprisan than in those who received placebo (83.3% vs. 0%, P<.0001), with a median time to onset of 3 days in the vilaprisan group. Similarly, more vilaprisan- than placebo-treated women achieved a response in heavy menstrual bleeding (91.7% vs. 25.0%, P<.0001). Serious adverse events were reported for 22 (27.8%) of 79 women and were evenly distributed among the 4 groups receiving vilaprisan and/or placebo. None of these events led to study discontinuation or were related to the liver, and no new safety findings were identified compared with the earlier phase 2 ASTEROID studies. CONCLUSION(S): Vilaprisan is efficacious and well tolerated over 12 weeks in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids. Further investigations of the long-term efficacy and safety of vilaprisan are warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03400943 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

High prevalence of heavy menstrual bleeding in women with rare bleeding disorders in the Netherlands: retrospective data from the RBiN study.

BACKGROUND: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is associated with a reduced quality of life and limitations in social and physical functioning. Data on HMB in women with rare bleeding disorders (RBDs), including coagulation factor deficiencies and fibrinolytic disorders, are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the prevalence, severity, and treatment of HMB in Dutch women with an RBD. METHODS: The Rare Bleeding Disorders in the Netherlands (RBiN) study included 263 patients with an RBD from all 6 hemophilia treatment centers (October 2017-November 2019). In this analysis, data of 111 women aged ≥16 years were studied. According to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis bleeding assessment tool, HMB symptoms were scored from 0 (no/trivial) to 4 (severe symptoms requiring medical intervention). HMB was defined as a score ≥1. Age at RBD diagnosis was extracted from patient files. RESULTS: HMB was reported by 80% of women (89/111) and was more prevalent in women with a fibrinolytic disorder (33/35; 94%) than in women with a coagulation factor deficiency (56/76; 74%) (P = .011). Of the 89 women with HMB, 82% (n = 73) ever required treatment. Multiple treatment modalities were frequently used, both in severe and mild deficiencies. Hormonal treatment was mostly used (n = 64; 88%), while antifibrinolytics were prescribed less frequently (n = 18; 25%). In women with HMB since menarche (n = 61; 69%), median age at RBD diagnosis was 28 years (IQR, 14-41). CONCLUSION: HMB is common in women with RBDs. Women with mild deficiencies also frequently reported HMB. Only a minority of women were treated with hemostatic agents. A significant diagnostic delay was observed after the onset of HMB symptoms.

A plain language summary of the long-term relugolix combination therapy study for uterine fibroids.

What is this summary about? This is a summary of a research study (known as a clinical trial) called the LIBERTY extension study. The LIBERTY extension study is a long-term study looking at how well a medicine called relugolix combination therapy worked in reducing blood loss during menstrual periods in women with uterine fibroids with heavy menstrual periods. Women were included in the extension study if they finished the 24-week LIBERTY 1 or LIBERTY 2 studies. Heavy menstrual periods were considered to be menstrual blood loss of about one-third of a cup of blood (80 ml) per cycle for two cycles or about two-thirds of a cup of blood (160 ml) during one cycle. The LIBERTY extension study also looked at whether relugolix combination therapy was safe to take for up to 1 year. What were the results? Out of 770 total women with uterine fibroids with heavy menstrual bleeding who took part in the LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2 studies, 476 took part in the LIBERTY extension study. From the start of the LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2 studies through the end of the LIBERTY extension: 163 women took relugolix combination therapy for 52 weeks 149 women took relugolix alone for 12 weeks followed by relugolix combination therapy for 40 weeks 164 women took placebo for 24 weeks followed by relugolix combination therapy for 28 weeks The LIBERTY extension study showed that most women in all three treatment groups responded to relugolix combination therapy by having less bleeding during their menstrual periods, having improved anemia symptoms, and having stable bone mineral loss. Side effects were similar across treatment groups, and the most common side effects were headaches and hot flushes. What do the results mean? Women with uterine fibroids with heavy menstrual bleeding taking relugolix combination therapy may have fewer uterine fibroid bleeding symptoms for up to 1 year of treatment. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03049735 (ClinicalTrials.gov) (LIBERTY 1) Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03103087 (ClinicalTrials.gov) (LIBERTY 2) Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03412890 (ClinicalTrials.gov) (LIBERTY extension study).

Recombinant von Willebrand factor and tranexamic acid for heavy menstrual bleeding in patients with mild and moderate von Willebrand disease in the USA (VWDMin): a phase 3, open-label, randomised, crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: Heavy menstrual bleeding occurs in 80% of women with von Willebrand disease and is associated with iron deficiency and poor response to current therapies. International guidelines indicate low certainty regarding effectiveness of hormonal therapy and tranexamic acid. Although von Willebrand factor (VWF) concentrate is approved for bleeds, no prospective trials guide its use in heavy menstrual bleeding. We aimed to compare recombinant VWF with tranexamic acid for reducing heavy menstrual bleeding in patients with von Willebrand disease. METHODS: VWDMin, a phase 3, open-label, randomised crossover trial, was done in 13 haemophilia treatment centres in the USA. Female patients aged 13-45 years with mild or moderate von Willebrand disease, defined as VWF ristocetin cofactor less than 0·50 IU/mL, and heavy menstrual bleeding, defined as a pictorial blood assessment chart (PBAC) score more than 100 in one of the past two cycles were eligible for enrolment. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to two consecutive cycles each of intravenous recombinant VWF, 40 IU/kg over 5-10 min on day 1, and oral tranexamic acid 1300 mg three times daily on days 1-5, the order determined by randomisation. The primary outcome was a 40-point reduction in PBAC score by day 5 after two cycles of treatment. Efficacy and safety were analysed in all patients with any post-baseline PBAC scores. The trial was stopped early due to slow recruitment on Feb 15, 2022, by a data safety monitoring board request, and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02606045. FINDINGS: Between Feb 12, 2019, and Nov 16, 2021, 39 patients were enrolled, 36 of whom completed the trial (17 received recombinant VWF then tranexamic acid and 19 received tranexamic acid then recombinant VWF). At the time of this unplanned interim analysis (data cutoff Jan 27, 2022), median follow-up was 23·97 weeks (IQR 21·81-28·14). The primary endpoint was not met, neither treatment corrected PBAC score to the normal range. Median PBAC score was significantly lower after two cycles with tranexamic acid than with recombinant VWF (146 [95% CI 117-199] vs 213 [152-298]; adjusted mean treatment difference 46 [95% CI 2-90]; p=0·039). There were no serious adverse events or treatment-related deaths and no grade 3-4 adverse events. The most common grade 1-2 adverse events were mucosal bleeding (four [6%] patients during tranexamic acid treatment vs zero during recombinant VWF treatment) and other bleeding (four [6%] vs two [3%]). INTERPRETATION: These interim data suggest that recombinant VWF is not superior to tranexamic acid in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding in patients with mild or moderate von Willebrand disease. These findings support discussion of treatment options for heavy menstrual bleeding with patients based on their preferences and lived experience. FUNDING: National Heart Lung Blood Institute (National Institutes of Health).

[Increased menstrual bleeding among direct oral anticoagulant users]. / Toegenomen menstrueel bloedverlies bij DOAC-gebruik.

BACKGROUND: Two-thirds of users of oral anticoagulants use direct oral anticoagulants, among which increasingly women in their reproductive age. The risk of severe or abnormal menstrual bleeding doubles to 70% when using anticoagulants. With rivaroxaban especially the risk seems higher than with vitamin K antagonists; with dabigatran possibly lower. CASE DESCRIPTION: We saw a 49-year-old woman who started the oral contraceptive pill because of heavy menstrual bleeding. After getting deep vein thrombosis we stopped the pill and started rivaroxaban. Despite leuproreline the heavy bleeding persisted and 6 blood transfusions were necessary, after which the type of anticoagulant was changed. Eventually, we performed a hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: Anticoagulants can cause severe menstrual bleeding, especially in women with a history of heavy menstrual periods. The type of anticoagulant can be changed and the bleeding can be treated by both hormonal and non-hormonal therapies.

Low-dose letrozole - an effective option for women with symptomatic adenomyosis awaiting IVF: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Can low-dose letrozole reduce dysmenorrhoea, menorrhagia and sonographic features in symptomatic women with adenomyosis awaiting IVF? DESIGN: This was a longitudinal randomized prospective pilot study to explore the effectiveness of low-dose letrozole and compare it with a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist in reducing dysmenorrhoea, menorrhagia and sonographic features in symptomatic women with adenomyosis awaiting IVF. The women were treated for 3 months, either with the GnRH agonist goserelin 3.6 mg/month (n = 77) or the aromatase inhibitor letrozole 2.5 mg three times weekly (n = 79). Dysmenorrhoea and menorrhagia were evaluated at randomization and followed up monthly using a visual analogue score (VAS) and pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC), respectively. A quantitative scoring method was used to assess the improvement of sonographic features after 3 months of treatment. RESULTS: Both groups reported a marked improvement in symptoms after 3 months of treatment. In both the letrozole and GnRH agonist groups, VAS and PBAC scores decreased significantly over the 3 months (letrozole: P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0001 for VAS and PBAC, respectively; GnRH agonist: P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0001 for VAS and PBAC, respectively). Participants on letrozole had regular menstruation cycles, while most of the women who received the GnRH agonist were amenorrhoeic, with only four women reporting mild bleeding. Haemoglobin concentrations also improved after both treatments (letrozole P = 0.0001, GnRH agonist P = 0.0001). A quantitative assessment of sonographic features showed significant improvements following both treatments (diffuse adenomyosis of the myometrium: letrozole P = 0.015, GnRH agonist P = 0.039; diffuse adenomyosis of the junctional zone: letrozole P = 0.025, GnRH agonist P = 0.001). Women with adenomyoma also responded well to both therapies (letrozole P = 0.049, GnRH agonist P = 0.024), whereas the letrozole group responded comparatively better in focal adenomyosis when the outer myometrium was involved (letrozole P < 0.001, GnRH agonist P = 0.26). No noticeable side effects were observed in women receiving letrozole therapy. Additionally, letrozole therapy was found to be more cost-effective than GnRH agonist treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose letrozole treatment is a low-cost alternative to a GnRH agonist, with comparable effects in improving the symptoms and sonographic features of adenomyosis in women awaiting IVF.

A plain language summary of the safety of relugolix combination therapy and improvement in symptoms in women with uterine fibroids from the LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2 studies.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of research studies (known as clinical trials) called LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2. The LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2 studies looked at how well a medication called relugolix combination therapy worked to reduce heavy bleeding at the time of menstruation compared with placebo. The studies also looked at what side effects were reported in women with uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: Researchers looked at 388 adult women in the LIBERTY 1 study and 382 adult women in the LIBERTY 2 study. All women had heavy menstrual bleeding with uterine fibroids before the start of the LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2 studies. The women were given one of three treatments during the studies: relugolix combination therapy or placebo for 24 weeks, or delayed relugolix combination therapy (relugolix alone for the first 12 weeks, then relugolix combination therapy for the last 12 weeks of the studies). More women taking relugolix combination therapy in the LIBERTY 1 study (73%) and LIBERTY 2 study (71%) had menstrual blood loss of less than one-third of a cup (80 mL) and had reduction of at least 50% less blood loss during their last menstrual period after 24 weeks of taking the medicine compared with placebo (LIBERTY 1: 19% and LIBERTY 2: 15%). The women taking relugolix combination therapy also had less pain than those taking placebo. Side effects were similar across treatment groups. Headaches and hot flushes were the most common side effects. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: More women with uterine fibroids taking relugolix combination therapy for 24 weeks were likely to have fewer uterine fibroid symptoms than women receiving placebo. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03049735 (LIBERTY 1); NCT03103087 (LIBERTY 2).

[Analysis of management efficacy in patients with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with antithrombotic therapy].

Objective: To evaluate different methods' efficacy of controlling acute bleeding and managing long-term menstruation in patients with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) associated with antithrombotic therapy. Methods: The clinical data of 22 cases with HMB associated with antithrombotic therapy admitted to Peking University People's Hospital from January 2010 to August 2022 were analyzed, aged 39 years old (26-46 years). Changes in menstrual volume, hemoglobin (Hb), and quality of life were collected after control of acute bleeding and long-term menstrual management. Menstrual volume was assessed by pictorial blood assessment chart (PBAC), and quality of life was assessed by menorrhagia multi-attribute scale (MMAS). Results: (1) Treatment of acute bleeding: of the 22 cases with HMB associated with antithrombotic therapy, 16 cases were treated in our hospital and 6 in other hospital for emergency bleeding; of the 16 cases treated in our hospital, 3 underwent emergency intrauterine Foley catheter balloon compression due to severe bleeding (Hb decreased by 20 to 40 g/L within 12 hours). Of the 22 cases with antithrombotic therapy-related HMB, 15 (including 2 cases with severe bleeding) underwent emergency aspiration or endometrial resection, and intraoperative placement of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) followed by a significant reduction in bleeding volume; 3 cases had controlled acute bleeding after rivaroxaban dose reduction and continued observation; 2 cases were given gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists to control acute bleeding in other hospital, of which 1 case was temporarily treated with periodic blood transfusion, and the other one patient underwent total hysterectomy; and 2 cases had temporary amenorrhea with oral mifepristone after intrauterine balloon compression or oral norethindrone. (2) Long-term menstrual management: of the 22 cases with antithrombotic therapy-related HMB, 15 had LNG-IUS placement and 12 had LNG-IUS placement for 6 months, and menstrual volume was significantly reduced [PBAC scores were 365.0 (272.5-460.0) vs 25.0 (12.5-37.5), respectively; Z=4.593, P<0.001], Hb was significantly increased [91.5 g/L (71.8-108.2 g/L) vs 128.5 g/L (121.2-142.5 g/L); Z=4.695, P<0.001], and quality of life was significantly improved [MMAS scores were 415.0 (327.5-472.5) vs 580.0 (570.0-580.0), respectively; Z=-3.062, P=0.002] before placement compared with 6 months after placement. Three rivaroxaban dose reduction patients' PBAC scores decreased by 20 to 35 but remained >100, and perceived quality of life did not change significantly. Two cases with temporary amenorrhea treated with oral mifepristone felt significantly improved quality of life, and the MMAS scores increased by 220 and 180, respectively. Conclusion: Intrauterine Foley catheter balloon compression, aspiration or endometrial ablation could be used to control acute bleeding in patients with antithrombotic therapy-related HMB, and LNG-IUS for long-term management could reduce menstrual volume, increase hemoglobin, and improve the quality of life of patients.

Comparative study of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and laparoscopic hysterectomy for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding in enlarged uteri.

OBJECTIVE: The levonorgestrel intrauterine system treatment prevents 67.7% of surgeries in patients with heavy menstrual bleeding and enlarged uteri. To evaluate the effectiveness of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in the treatment of patients with heavy menstrual bleeding and an enlarged uterus and to compare satisfaction and its complications with hysterectomy. METHODS: This was a comparative cross-sectional observational study of women with heavy menstrual bleeding and an enlarged uterus. Sixty-two women were treated and followed up for four years. Insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system was performed in Group 1, and laparoscopic hysterectomy was performed in Group 2. RESULTS: In Group 1 (n=31), 21 patients (67.7%) showed improvement in the bleeding pattern, and 11 patients (35.5%) had amenorrhea. Five patients (16.1%) remained with heavy bleeding and were considered to have experienced treatment failure. There were seven expulsions (22.6%); in five patients, bleeding remained heavy, but in two patients the bleeding returned to that of normal menstruation. No relationship was found between treatment failure and greater hysterometries (p=0.40) or greater uterine volumes (p=0.50), whereas expulsion was greater in uteri with smaller hysterometries (p=0.04). There were 13 (21%) complications, seven (53.8%) in the group that underwent insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (all were device expulsions), and six (46.2%) in the surgical group, which were the most severe ones (p=0.76). Regarding satisfaction, 12 patients (38.7%) were dissatisfied with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and one (3.23%) was dissatisfied with the surgical treatment (p=0.00). CONCLUSION: Treatment with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in patients with heavy menstrual bleeding and an enlarged uterus was effective, and when compared with laparoscopic hysterectomy, it had a lower rate of satisfaction and the same rate of complications, although less severe.